MA ManufOS
MA

Operator Performance

Efficiency is measured only on time the operator could influence. Machine, Maintenance, Material and Facility / External losses are excluded from the calculation.

Average operator efficiency
91.4%
275,546 good vs 301,575 expected
Operators on target
5
≥ 94% efficiency
Operators below target
3
85% – 93.99% efficiency
Operators requiring attention
1
< 85% efficiency

Filters

9 operators · 12 runs · 2026-08-18 → 2026-08-20 (all recorded runs)

Operator efficiency trend

Plant-level efficiency per production day, against the 94% configured target.

Operators in the selected period

Select a row for run history and the operator-controlled loss reasons behind the figure.
OperatorShiftCurrent / most recent machineGood piecesRejectedQuality rateControllable timeOperator-controlled downtimeEfficiency Status
Nadia Fontaner
OP-1007
Shift 2CTR-01Cutting / Trimming Line 125,89052098.0%6h 01m18m110.3%On Target
Serena Vaikule
OP-1005
Shift 2THF-02Thermoforming Line 237,8651,07597.2%9h 40m23m104.7%On Target
Tomasz Grelik
OP-1002
Shift 1EXT-01Extrusion Line 17,74214898.1%5h 34m8m95.9%On Target
Petar Volinov
OP-1010
Shift 3EXT-01Extrusion Line 110,51017098.4%7h 34m6m95.8%On Target
Ilva Norberg
OP-1003
Shift 1CTR-01Cutting / Trimming Line 119,21841297.9%5h 13m9m94.5%On Target
Marisel Duvant
OP-1001
Shift 1THF-01Thermoforming Line 118,04137997.9%5h 34m6m90.0%Below Target
Vera Lisandru
OP-1009
Shift 3THF-03Thermoforming Line 327,72089096.9%6h 12m14m87.7%Below Target
Rafael Ostenbrink
OP-1004
Shift 1PKG-01Packing Line 169,19063099.1%13h 20m13m87.3%Below Target
Bruno Kestermann
OP-1008
Shift 2PKG-02Packing Line 259,37092098.5%12h 04m12m82.9%Attention

Status labels describe the operational measurement only. Machine, Maintenance, Material and Facility / External downtime is never attributed to an operator; Process and Quality losses count only where the Downtime module classified them as operator controllable.